<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why everyone&#8217;s an armchair psychologist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saynotostigma.com/2010/02/why-everyones-an-armchair-psychologist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saynotostigma.com/2010/02/why-everyones-an-armchair-psychologist/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-everyones-an-armchair-psychologist</link>
	<description>a blog of The Menninger Clinic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://saynotostigma.com/2010/02/why-everyones-an-armchair-psychologist/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saynotostigma.com/?p=214#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>Hi Dr. Allen,

Love reading about mentalizing.  Hoping you can help me here.  From the example above, I&#039;m not sure why the non-mentalizing child would pick the blue cabinet.  For that matter, I&#039;m not sure why if the child picked the green cabinet, that would indicate the child was mentalizing.

As far as I&#039;m concerned, if the child picked the blue cabinet, that would be called *mind reading*.  Did I miss something from the example?  Please help.

Sincerely,

Lisa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr. Allen,</p>
<p>Love reading about mentalizing.  Hoping you can help me here.  From the example above, I&#8217;m not sure why the non-mentalizing child would pick the blue cabinet.  For that matter, I&#8217;m not sure why if the child picked the green cabinet, that would indicate the child was mentalizing.</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, if the child picked the blue cabinet, that would be called *mind reading*.  Did I miss something from the example?  Please help.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://saynotostigma.com/2010/02/why-everyones-an-armchair-psychologist/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saynotostigma.com/?p=214#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Dear Dr. Allen,

Do you have plans for writing a book about mentalizing for educated laypeople-like Coping With Trauma? I&#039;ve read the Handbook that you wrote a chapter in and also Mentalizing in Clinical Practice (I hope I have that title correct)? Also, the other day, a professor asked me, what is the difference between identification and mentalizing. I was presenting a thesis idea that the Nazis couldn&#039;t mentalize. I explained the theoretical basis of mentalizing-attachment, etc. But, an entire group of people-not all had been traumatized or probably couldn&#039;t mentalize in other arenas of their lives. Clearly, it&#039;s different but I can&#039;t quite articulate it. Also, the &quot;bystanders&quot; were not mentalizing either. I read an article you wrote about evil. But, were they evil to begin with? Or, what shut off their mentalizing capacities. Perhaps, it&#039;s the object or subject (group or person) who is to be mentalized. They didn&#039;t want to keep the victim&#039;s mind in mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. Allen,</p>
<p>Do you have plans for writing a book about mentalizing for educated laypeople-like Coping With Trauma? I&#8217;ve read the Handbook that you wrote a chapter in and also Mentalizing in Clinical Practice (I hope I have that title correct)? Also, the other day, a professor asked me, what is the difference between identification and mentalizing. I was presenting a thesis idea that the Nazis couldn&#8217;t mentalize. I explained the theoretical basis of mentalizing-attachment, etc. But, an entire group of people-not all had been traumatized or probably couldn&#8217;t mentalize in other arenas of their lives. Clearly, it&#8217;s different but I can&#8217;t quite articulate it. Also, the &#8220;bystanders&#8221; were not mentalizing either. I read an article you wrote about evil. But, were they evil to begin with? Or, what shut off their mentalizing capacities. Perhaps, it&#8217;s the object or subject (group or person) who is to be mentalized. They didn&#8217;t want to keep the victim&#8217;s mind in mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
